• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The article starts with the sentence “This is a timeline of the war in Donbas for the year 2014.” The first item on the timeline is from April 7.

    I said above that Russia invaded the Donbas in 2014. This article describes the Russian invasion of the Donbas starting in 2014. The specific details of what happened after that are not particularly relevant.

    Or are you still following Russia’s narrative that it was all just troops “on vacation” who were “volunteering” to go to the Donbas and fight Ukraine? With borrowed and stolen tanks and whatnot? Nobody believed that.

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      These aren’t Russian soldiers. This article is about the civil war in Ukraine. These are people with Ukrainian passports. The article uses the phrasing “Pro-Russian” because the separatists wanted economic integration with Russia after gaining independence. This is pragmatic, they would naturally be cut off from the west, and their existing economic integration with Russia was an asset to them. There’s no invasion detailed in this article, other than by the AFU if you consider the break away republics to have been legitimate.