Instead of the perfectly-fine “expired” food going to the dumpster, feed people. Help the community.

  • neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, to the last bullet, we have good Samaritan laws. We could totally pass a law that says “grocery stores can and should provide reasonably safe, leftover food to poor people and will not be punished if those reasonable actions result in bad things happening”. You are allowed to just wail on an unconscious dudes chest for minutes until paramedics arrive and then not be sued for the three cracked ribs.

    But cmon. We all know that grocery stores know that once people realize expired food is generally safe a) people will buy less food and b) people will show up to get free expired food and buy less food.

    Scarcity is a necessity under capitalism. Movie theaters aren’t going to release blooper reels for free. They add them to the credits or put them in the editors cut release. A luxury clothing brand isn’t going to sell seconds, they will destroy or rework material that isn’t sellable.

      • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Capitalism, which provides such an excess of food that we’re throwing it out, is the problem? True, when the shelves are bare and no-one has food this won’t be a problem anymore.

        But it’s not exactly a step forward is it?

        • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t understand your meaning of your comment. Not having capitalism means bare shelves in the future? How?

        • Sloth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          You are completly right. It’s not capitalism’s fault that companies would rather destroy essentials to save a few bucks rather than give it to those who need them. No, obviously the poor people just need to stop being poor. That’ll solve global hunger without cutting into the profits of those poor CEOs.