And what a year has 2023 been. But we’ll leave all that for the end of year review ;)

Anyway, I want to thank all our editors, and our readers of course, who support us on the daily by using and promoting ProleWiki around them, showing that our model works.

See you next year! (Joking there will be plenty more things happening throughout the rest of 2023 and 2024)

  • proletarian_girlboss@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Very blessed. I wonder what it was like all those years ago. Seeing the difference between then and now would be interesting. And I still need to apply to become an editor.

    • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The evolution of ProleWiki can essentially be broken down into three or four periods:

      • The initial hype (2020-jan or feb 2021). Lots of interest, everything had yet to be made, this is where we saw all the language instances pop up and features such as the library and essays appear in their first incarnation (essentially just a table people filled up manually). Eventually interest subsided and people realized how much work it was going to take to make this thing from scratch.
      • The lull years (2021-Q4 2022). Not much was happening during this time. Pages were still being made and we still advertised on social media etc, but it was pretty much day-to-day business as usual. The discord was almost entirely dead, there was essentially no community and very few editors. I haven’t said this anywhere else yet (and it’s history now), but at the time I was almost thinking of quitting the project (having been an admin since ~jan 2021) because we still had to go through account requests and discord vetting tickets, but it wasn’t going anywhere lol. But alas, I’m a very selective quitter. To be honest at the time I just wanted to write pages on philosophy and stuff, I didn’t really care to learn mediaWiki to help on the tech end of things. This period wasn’t really one of no growth or 0 activity whatsoever, it’s just that not much of interest happened on our end. We introduced the vetting questions for example in 2022 (before that you could write any introductory text you wanted) and grew our Twitter slowly (unfortunately by the patsoc admin so it required some cleanup afterwards when we banned him).
      • Sudden activity (Q4 2022-Feb 2023). Starting around September 2022, we suddenly started getting activity. It started when three-four members joined on the discord at around the same time and started talking to each other, which eventually got more people to talk etc etc. We were able to recruit them as well, and from there interest in the project gradually went back up, on my end as well.
      • Rationalization and opening up period (Feb 2023-now). This could arguably be part of the previous period. As things picked momentum, they reached a point around Feb. 2023 where we realized we had built a community and now needed to establish some processes as well as promote democratic centralism. We started sending account requests to the editors for example to be voted on. But we also asked questions about what we want ProleWiki to be, who we want to be editors, what the role of the admin team is, who we want to write for, etc. We’re still technically in this period, opening up tasks to the editorship that the admins otherwise would take care of. It’s also a period where we try more things out as we really have the resources (and ways to gather feedback) to do it now. We actually have a new library maintainer for example who should actually make a post very soon on this community.

      Otherwise not too much has changed, Wikimedia archives all revisions of a page and you can see the old Library at Library/Archive and same for the Essays (just add that /Archive after the URL), you can then go into their revision history and look at the very first library for example. Personally I still find it strange that it only picked up 6-7 months ago, it feels like it’s always been this way on ProleWiki lol.

      • 新星 [they/them/🏳️‍⚧️]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        started when three-four members joined on the discord at around the same time and started talking to each other,

        My headcanon now includes that Wisconcom is secretly responsible for saving ProleWiki zoidberg saluting 2

        • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          lol he joined a bit earlier than those 3 and already was giving us trouble, it definitely help that they joined later on to diversify the pool of people who debated him.

  • FlightSimEnjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Português
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I was planning on starting a translation effort to translate pages from english to portuguese today. Didn’t know that it was Prolewiki’s anniversary today though.

    edit: I’m literally turning on my computer right now to start translating.

    edit2: Just noticed that I don’t have permission to create new articles, so I’m gonna stick with completing the ones that already exist for now.

    • Soviet Snake@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think the idea was that each language of ProleWiki would create its articles organically rather than having everything translated from English.

      • FlightSimEnjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Português
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think that would be too idealistic. No chinese person had to reinvent marxism just because Marx was german, they just read Marx and then adapted it to China.

        I think the same would be nice to PW. First translate everything so that our comrades that do not speak english can have the information, and then modify the existing pages to reflect the ideas of the people who speak that language.

        Obviously, if the PW community doesn’t like this, I won’t force it. But I think that growing each language independently would discourage people to contribute at first, since only people who come explicitly to contribute would visit a website without content.

        edit: Also, there is no reason to translate pages about things that aren’t relevant to portuguese-speaking countries, so I don’t plan on doing that.

        edit2: I forgot to mention that in general most people in the 3rd world do not speak english, so they rely heavily on translations of works to their languages.