• dartos@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve noticed that the lemmy crowd seems more accepting of AI stuff than the Reddit crowd was

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean for tech stuff it’s fantastic. I could spend 30 minutes working out a regex to grep the logs in the format I need or I could have a back and forth with ChatGPT and get it sorted in 5.

      I still don’t want it to write my TV or movies. Or code to a significant degree.

      • Colonel Sanders@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the flip side, anytime I’ve tried to use it to write python scripts for me, it always seems to get them slightly wrong. Nothing that a little troubleshooting can’t handle, and certainly helps to get me in the ballpark of what I’m looking for, but I think it still has a little ways to go for specific coding use cases.

        • TheSaneWriter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the key there is that ChatGPT isn’t able to run its own code, so all it can do is generate code which “looks” right, which in practice is close to functional but not quite. In order for the code it writes to reliably work, I think it would need a builtin interpreter/compiler to actually run the code, and for it to iterate constantly making small modifications until the code runs, then return the final result to the user.

          • icosahedron@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The new code interpreter is able to run its own code, but i haven’t personally tested it to see if its code is more often functional.

      • Sheltac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It can even deal with basic algebra, it’s awesome. I can’t be fucked to work out this 16-var linear system, or even to write out the sympy to do it.

        But guess who is?

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use ChatGPT to romanize Farsi script from song texts and such. There is no other tool that works even remotely well and the AI somehow knows how to properly transliterate.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I for one welcome our SkyNet overlords. They can’t be much worse than the current global leaders…

        • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I always say “please” and “thank you” when using chatGPT. When the AI finally takes over and subsequently and inevitably concludes that the world would be a better place without humans, it may remember that myself specifically was always friendly. Maybe it’ll then have the courtesy to nuke my house directly instead of making me ultimatively succumb to nuclear winter.

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s genius! I’ve been trying to figure out how to incorporate ChatGPT-like bots into my work, but haven’t found it to be that useful. I don’t write a lot of regex, but hate it every time I do, so I’ll definitely be trying this next time I need it.

      • mikelykzit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        OMG. Using it for RegEx searches! How had that not even crossed my mind?

        I’ve tried learning RegEx basics and using some websites to point me in the right direction when a specific use comes up, but tuning the search string correctly usually takes longer than it’s been worth. Off to ChatGPT it is!

        • pressanykeynow@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d use it with caution as there are no small mistakes in regex - any can lead to big problems, and ChatGPT does often give wrong or not entirely correct answers.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You need to know regex to use it with chatgpt as it’s generally wrong on the first go. I use regex 101 to verify before I run it on anything.

          Take the udemy course on regex if you’re having trouble getting it. It’s fantastic and you’ll go from 20 to a 100 real fast.

    • throwsbooks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s probably related to the fact that it seems a lot of Lemmy users are in tech, rather than art.

      I think generative AI is a great tool, but a lot of people who don’t understand how it works either overestimate (it can do everything and it’s so smart!!) or underestimate it (all it does is steal my work!!)

        • throwsbooks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personally, I’m a comp sci graduate who did several courses exploring AI, but I actually started out in fine arts and continue to paint, write, and play music to this day. I’m sure I’ll be blending these studies in some way when I move on to my master’s.

          I agree that automation is scary. It’s unregulated. But it’s not the tech so much that’s evil, but rather the employers who see it as a reason to get rid of employees. And before, it’d be manual labour that we replaced with machines. People doing mental labour thought they were immune, until now they’re not. Our economic system’s going to need to change in some way.

          But generative AI can be very good even for artists. For example, sometimes I suffer from writer’s block (who doesn’t?). Now, I can feed what I’m working on into chatGPT and have it spit out an example of the next paragraph. Sometimes that’s enough to spur me on so I can write the next page.

          Artist movements in general are pretty conservative. When digital painting first became a thing, allowing people use layers and filters so easily, the kneejerk reaction by artists was to consider it cheating.

          My hope is that in an ideal world, human-made art becomes valuable in the future precisely because it has the human touch. Live music played on real instruments, paintings on canvas, the sorts of things with quirks and imperfections and a human element that can’t be mass produced. Let the corporations have their algorithmic, soulless advertisements, and let the people focus on true self expression.

          But then for people without artistic talent, say those who want to make indie games but can’t hire an artist or a musician because they’re just some kid with a dream and little experience? Hell, why not let them generate some assets with AI?

          But we need to make sure that people aren’t afraid of becoming homeless, starving on the streets. I think, we’re not getting rid of AI at this point, it’s too powerful, and I don’t have an answer to our societal problems. For better or worse, we’ll adapt.

          • surrendertogravity@wayfarershaven.eu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate this point of view! My BA is in visual arts, but I’ve also leaned heavily into tech, programming as a hobby, etc.

            I think there’s a lot of different topical threads at play when it comes to AI art (classism and fine art, what average viewers vs trained viewers find appealing in a visual medium, etc) – but the economic issue that you point out are really key. Many artists rely on their craft for their literal bodily survival, so AI art is very much a real threat to them.

            But, when I first interacted with Midjourney, and seeing my mom (just an average lady) being excited about AI generated art, I can’t help but see it like photography – all of a sudden the average person gets access to a way of visually capturing things that make them happy, that they think look cool, something they saw in a dream but didn’t have the skill to create visually… and that doesn’t sound like an inherently bad thing to me.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Accepting of AI as a concept yes. But we’re not too accepting of the current generation of theft-markov-generators that companies want to try and replace us with.

      • dartos@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re a lot more than markov generators, but yeah. I don’t really think, in the long run, we’re going to see too many jobs displaced by AI.

        Im not convinced that our statistics based training methods will lead to true iRobot style AGI.

        And any company (except maybe visual novel shops) that fires people in favor of AI is going to regret it within 2 years.

        • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I’m being facetious when I call them markovs. I’m mainly just saying that they are basically regurgitating copyrighted material based on statistics, so I believe they are just automated copyright violations.

          Completely agree with your comment.

    • Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just think it’s awesome technology and that we shouldn’t be holding it back. AI is pandora’s box, and that box can’t be closed now that it’s open.

      All these attempts to restrict it remind me of the old efforts to stop people from taping TV shows with their VCRs.