this is not my standard. my standard is “do i want them to win”. you get to decide on your own standards. i hope your standards don’t allow you to vote for genocide.
I asked an important question that was not designed to be petulant in any way. I’ll be polite and not bother you if you refuse to answer it due to emotional reasons. Thank you for your conversation.
it’s not about emotions. it’s that your “important question” was in fact not asked in good faith. when i gave you a more complete answer than you wanted, you demanded simple yes-or-no answers so you could continue to brow-beat me. framing my response as emotional when, in fact, you are the one showing petulance, is just DARVO.
If a third-party candidate has an extremely unlikely chance to win, now what?
then someone i don’t want to win becomes president.
If you consider all the people you don’t want to win, are they equal to you? Or are there some people that you want to win less than others?
this is not my standard. my standard is “do i want them to win”. you get to decide on your own standards. i hope your standards don’t allow you to vote for genocide.
You didn’t answer the question.
don’t be petulant. i told you how i make my decision.
I asked an important question that was not designed to be petulant in any way. I’ll be polite and not bother you if you refuse to answer it due to emotional reasons. Thank you for your conversation.
it’s not about emotions. it’s that your “important question” was in fact not asked in good faith. when i gave you a more complete answer than you wanted, you demanded simple yes-or-no answers so you could continue to brow-beat me. framing my response as emotional when, in fact, you are the one showing petulance, is just DARVO.