• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wish them the best. But this feels weird. Pumping water seems much easier than moving physical objects

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Are wenches simpler than big ass hydro pumps? Don’t know…plus you have to deal with water evaporating and erosion.

      The level of effort seems comparable.

      Edit: The energy vault design is kind of brilliant in its simplicity. I had to look it up. Its a building full of modular elevator shafts that have huge weights in them. Each one has an electric engine at the top.

      Excess energy means they pull the weights up. When you need energy, you regeneratively break the weight back down.

      So essentially it’s one complex moving part at the top of each shaft.

      That seems much easier to maintain than a giant basin of water, pumps to move the water up, turbines to capture the output, and big ass valves to control the flow.

      You can put these anywhere…water storage will be environment dependent for a lot of reasons.

      I don’t think either one is better, just depends on the location and application.

        • chakan2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yea, I agree with that. If the landscape is conducive to it, hydro makes more sense.

          I think they’re both very cool chunks of engineering.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Are wenches simpler than big ass hydro pumps?

        Heavy weights at the end of 100m cables blowing in the wind are incredibly difficult to work with compared to water pumps. It is why Crane Operator is a profession and Water Pumper is not.

        • chakan2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          100m cables blowing in the wind are incredibly difficult to work

          They’re enclosed. No wind.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well, at least they fixed one part of the design. The working model they demoed was open-air.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s really not though.

        We’ve been doing it pretty much since the dawn of civilization.

        With modern pumps and a modern understanding of physics and fluid dynamics, it’s not a huge problem to design a system for pumping water up a slope.

        So many kilowatts of motor power gives you so many meters of head. Check valves and appropriately sized pumps can allow for the movement of huge amounts of water. And with hydro storage, you’re not really running the system at full bore the whole time anyway.

        Water also happens to be fairly dense stuff while being a fluid, so it can store a lot of kinetic energy in pretty much any container you put it in.

        Brick of concrete also store a lot of energy, but require a huge building whose sole purpose is to move bricks around. Whereas hydro also allows governments to store valuable drinking water and get electricity when they need it.

        • naturalgasbad@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The real question isn’t “why not build pumped hydro” but “why not build pumped hydro in Shanghai.”

          Look at an elevation map of Shanghai and the surrounding provinces: Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui. They’re not exactly “mountainous.”

    • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s what I was thinking. And, they don’t really give any reason why their design is better.

    • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      ? How do you figure? Fluids tend to leak, corrode/erode whatever they come in contact with and generally is a hassle to maintain. Pumped hydro as done normally with large dams is also damaging to the local ecosystem.