• 18 Posts
  • 236 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle



  • It is not required for people to consciously falsify data for science to come up with false conclusions.

    This is true, but even if it unintentionally falsifies data, other discoveries with correct data will reveal that this other data is wrong, so this theory will be put under question, to see if it holds water. If it doesn’t, than that theory is rejected.

    That is what science does, it corrects itself if new more correct data is presented, thus striving for perfection.

    The idea is to know everything about everything. This is of corse the goal, which is practically unachievable.















  • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.mltoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhat does an ideal world look like to you?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mine consides with yours, except it’s a bit more techy. We’d still need someone to grow food for everyone on the planet, and that’s where robots come in… and for everything else that is just tedious or repetitive to do. We’d also need central coordination regarding things like solar panel control, or nuclear power plant control, so a central AI will most probably dominate on all devices.

    There is no currency, we have an advanced socialist society. We don’t have polititians, we have “shamans” (people that guide the rest and keep the social piece, as well as uphold the values of the society). These people are not chosen by elections, they’re groomed from youngsters to be leaders and embedded with the values this society upholds the most. Of course, they’re carefully screened and chosen, based on certain tests that all children have to take, and scored on that (compassion and other highly valued human traits that are considered weaknesses in today’s society, leadership skills, etc.).