![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/JSKx2l6tLB.jpg)
that is very succinctly putting into words as to why I’m going crazy at my job
that is very succinctly putting into words as to why I’m going crazy at my job
I feel like, a while ago, we’ve entered some weird sort of alienation from work event horizon where the people at the top absolutely forgot you need “person who does stuff” eventually. Like it’s so many levels and excel spreadsheets and white papers and what have you removed the idea that the people who produce things aren’t some aetheric blob but like, actual people doing things, is forgotten.
Only when the last process has been streamlined, the final KPI hit, and the final downsizing accomplished, will we realize we cannot build from money or something
- a self-fulfilling prophecy of pitbulls having a bad reputation and actively being sought out by people who want vicious dogs and who will treat their dogs in such a way as to encourage that behavior.
I’m pretty neutral on dog genetics but tbh it still ends you at the same conclusion; not everyone should just be able to get the dog that kills you
Even if ChatGPT was literally a perfect copy of a human being it would still be 0 steps closer to a general intelligence because it does not fucking understand WHAT or HOW to actually do the things it suggests.
What if we AI passes the turing test not because computers got intelligent but because people got dumber
I understand your vision now
Explore might be pushing it but there’s the old 3rd Gen AA title Darkest of Days where you you’re a timecop and get to mow down american civil war formations with your future machine gun
I feel like Battlebits gets pretty close to this?
TF2 Competitive
the grind got so shitty the logistics players actually went on strike
logistics win wars every time but it’s too boring for armchair generals
notable exception the houthis, I don’t know how the fuck they’re doing it
She’s gonna take you back to the past,
to show you some tanks that suck ass,
she’d rather driiiiiiiiiiiive a t-34,
than an overengineered nazi mess
she’s the angry ww2 neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerd
Aha! But Ukraine is backed by the west, which has
[checks notes]
also no manufacturing capacity left?
we get a lot of people learning what “digital sovereignity” means
just kidding, the state is going to pay every business affected gajillion dollars to buy more google
It is rather clear, that this code is not aimed at firefox users to slow down their loading time.
alternatively it’s just well designed
you ever wonder if there was like a short outlier on national core strength during that era?
I feel like there’s a great vibe difference in people collecting things that are unintentionally rare and those that collect intentionally rare things
To stick with the given example: I think some guy collecting vintage Mockbas would be a lot cooler than some guy collecting the newest limited edition sneaker.
I suppose if cars, in their same number and usage, were traded for horses, then besides the epic problem of feeding them all, many cities would be far more dangerous now from the great horde of horses marching through every day!
I’ll start off here: eh, maybe. Certainly a lot more full of massive amounts of poop everywhere, that was a common problem even with not every man, woman and child a horse, it’s where we got sidewalks from - so you could walk in not-poop.
Sure, and you also don’t refill them every 200 miles from the nearest highway hay-station. (Well, kind of…) But there were still horses clustered in many cities for a lot of the time, right? Where now there are cars?
Yes, but nowhere near the same extent. Check out old city street pictures from the 1910 and 1920s. Sure, you’ll see cars, they had been invented and hell, you still see horses, except pretty much all of them barring the ones with cops on it are pulling some thing or another. And also there’s trams and also there’s just a buttload of people walking - which is what most of them did.
The point I’m getting at is the notion that we basically just replaced horses with cars, for the most part, but that’s ahistorical. We’ve replaced horses and trams and walking and cycling - all of which were done a lot - with cars. People used and could use a variety of options, now, eh, not so much, they’re not really viable for a lot of people.
But then that’s not because cars are so inherently great for any and all transporation, it’s just we’ve built cities to accomodate cars first, foremost and nigh exclusively, to the detriment of everything else. You wouldn’t find me arguing to bring back the horses, but trams, cycling, walking? Absolutely.
Because we have pretty much gained nothing from cars. People still have roughly the same commute as before - they just live further away and travel the same time, except now the societal cost of doing that is 10x the price per trip. People have a time budget for travel, not a distance budget, and that’s stayed pretty much the same.
Funny thing about horses - apparently when cities moved over to cars from horses they became safer. Because horses spook: and one spooked horse can spook the rest and you get a stampede.
You seem cool enough / not carbrained that I’d like to suggest you to take a closer look at this. The perception of “horse -> car” as per transportation is pretty prevalent but it doesn’t really hold up in the sense this fun fact is often touted, it’s born out of a car based status quo applied backwards to horses mostly.
Which market is it that is producing smaller EVs? They’re all just regular cars turned EV, which means they’re heavier and you can’t feature-rich your way out of physics as per pedestrian safety
I have the money to buy a titanium bicycle. They just don’t build one cheap enough.