If you want, you could use Telegram without your real phone number by either getting a virtual number from Google Voice or another service, or you could buy a Telegram-only number from their fragment site.
Great! If you get a chance, I’d be interested to hear about your rtx complaints.
I’m not who you asked, and not a user of pkgx, but one of the reasons I prefer rtx (which supports asdf plugins) to asdf is that by default it doesn’t use shims, but updates the PATH instead.
So for example, running which python
will show me a clearly versioned python executable path, rather than a mysterious shim that represents a different realpath at different times.
No Zsh support for now, and maybe no user fonts?
And a warning: it’s got telemetry on by default.
Konsole is my second favorite terminal app. Wezterm may be your holy grail.
It seems actively developed. Is your issue in the tracker?
Material Files?
Find the wiki page for “hard mode.”
I mentioned it in a reply but it deserves its own top-level answer.
Sorry I don’t know how to kbin yet. Maybe the link provided by the bot that replied to me is better?
Are there any concatenative/stack/Factor kbin magazines you know of?
There are some concatenative-related discord links in the sidebar of https://programming.dev/c/concatenative you may or may not be able to stand.
Anyway answering the main post: Factor (stack/concatenative), Nim, Roc, Zsh
The Wikipedia link you provide here for copyleft does not say that permissive licenses are a subset of copyleft licenses, but rather contrasts the two categories. For example, you can scroll down to the table at “Types and relation to other licenses,” where you can see MIT is not in the green Copyleft column.
If you check Wikipedia’s Copyleft software licenses category, you’ll see MIT is absent.
The Wikipedia link you provide for permissive states:
The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license . . .
No, I don’t. I don’t know the strict definition of copyleft, so I went to the source you indicated to get a better understanding. And the phrase I found there:
Unlike copyleft software licenses, the MIT License . . .
certainly indicates that the MIT License is not copyleft.
También: Siduction (derivada de Debian Sid), Alpine (Edge), Solus, Chimera Linux, OpenMandriva ROME, Gentoo/Funtoo/Exherbo, y otros en la familia de openSUSE (?).
I checked the wiki page you kind of linked, and the third sentence is:
Unlike copyleft software licenses, the MIT License also permits reuse within proprietary software, provided that all copies of the software or its substantial portions include a copy of the terms of the MIT License and also a copyright notice.
No unfortunately I haven’t tried Chimera yet, but its design is close to my ideal distro. I’d especially love to see its package repos fill up, but the selection is tight as it stands.
Just clarifying in case there’s a mix-up: Siduction is a desktop distro based on Debian Sid, not exactly the same distro. It’s my favorite take on Debian so far but honestly I always have something to grumble about in apt-world.
I just want to add that for Debian with a rolling, up-to-date experience, Siduction does that nicely.
I don’t know SP or how its shortcuts work, but did you check if you already have those shortcuts assigned in plasma’s global shortcuts? The easiest way is to assign them to any plasma global shortcut and see if it tells you there’s a conflict.
If that’s not it, can you trigger those SP actions with an external command? Then you could do it through plasma global shortcuts.