Yes. Definatly. Not necessarily because of the world going one way or another but because our global population is rapidly increasing. 1 decade is enough to increase the global population by 1 billion people.

Not when it’s smashed to pieces, scattered all over a landfill

Surprised the battery lasted that long. My gold cartridge is dead since way back.

If it makes you feel better. I also reserve judgement until more information is out. The counter arguments as to why it wouldn’t be Israel does make sense to me. Lack of crater. Hospital walls intact. Hamas were firing rockets over the hospital. And the death figure is reported by Hamas. Most likely incredibly inflated.

Since when was recognized terror organisations reliable sources?

Samsung S10 has Audio jack and SD slot.

I’m curious. Put yourself in Israel’s shoes. You’ve been massively attacked by Hamas from Gaza.

What would you do next? How would you approach this war?

How would you defend yourself to make sure this never happens again.

Reading the comments, smiling at the fact that so much people complaining about is already illegal here and not a problem.

Personally. I’d make it illegal to start small talk about the fucking weather. I can see that’s raining too. Yes that is annoying. Haha, no I won’t put shampoo in my hair on my way home. I don’t know when it will stop. Do I look like a meteorologist?

My bad. I completely read that wrong. Could have sworn I saw a “not” in there.

Apple don’t want it because it removes part of their marketing strategy. (Being, if your friends have Apple, you also need apple)

Apple Users don’t know what it is.

You say you don’t know what it is or does. Yet you say you’d love to have it. That’s quite contradictory don’t you think?

And it WOULD impact their experience.

It amazes me that people like you, who don’t actually know or understand the topic, can be so vocal about your opinions and conclusions. About something you don’t know.

It’s the USB-C standard all over… “Apple and majority of their users don’t care”. And that’s still not what it’s about. It’s about setting a standard so we don’t need 9 different cables and 7 different apps, just to send a God damn picture or video.

Edit: I misread the comment. I take back what I said that’s striked over. My bad. Sorry.

Elden Ring, Tears of The Kingdom, Baldurs Gate 3 comes to mind.

And where does teens get the idea to smoke from? Is it from grandpa that coughs louder than a jet engine? Or is it the older cooler teens who got the idea from older teens, who got the…

You get the point.

I smoked as a teen because some of my friends did, they smoked because some of their friends did. And you don’t have to look very far to find the 18-20 year olds who provided them.

Luckily, I never smoked much and mostly kept it to social smoking which made it very easy for me to quit once I grew up and developed some brain-cells that enjoyed co-operating with eachother.

If you can prove it. Which takes time and money. It would be far better to update laws to keep up with our tines and put a stop to it before it begins.

What’s being done to Mr Beast, and also Tom Hanks. Is nothing short of Identify theft.

Are you seriously comparing alcohol. To people stealing someone’s likeness to commit fraud?

5000 notifications per day? That’s over 3 notifications per minute.

Are they opting in to get a notification every time someone in a thousand+ member discord server posts anything at all?

If they can send you, your own password in plain text. That’s already bad enough. Just not good practise.

If you are confident in you assessment. I implore you to go and try it out for yourself. Please.

You can repeat that phrase as many times are you wish. It doesn’t make it true.

You are bound by the laws and responsibilities that come with being a citizen of whatever country you’re a citizen of. Some may have more freedom than others. But if you truly believe that your freedom doesn’t have any bounds. You are nothing but disillusioned.

Go 1 year without paying your taxes, and you’ll see just how much freedom you truly have.

Let me be more specific. You are not allowed to be butt naken in the streets of copenhagen. That would be disorderly conduct.

You do not have the freedom to be naked wherever you please.

The argument of “freedom is freedom” is not a good one. Because that doesn’t exist anywhere. Your freedom is always limited one way or the other.

What? There doesn’t have to be a violent response for something to be incitement.

Do you understand what incitement means? It’s what we call actions that intend to provoke unlawful behavior.

There does not need to be a response for something to be provokiotive. The question is. How much provocation us too much.

You have to balance freedom against what is too much provocation. We do it all the time. If you go into town and just start to insult random people. You might be charged with disturbance of the peace. Freedom isn’t limitless.

You can be charged with “Incitement against ethnic/religious groups” that is already illegal. And we decided those are actions punishable by law. That already exists.

They are arguing that burning their holy scripture in public, is a form of hateful incitement. That it is inciting enough that it shouldn’t be allowed in public.

Others are arguing that it is not inciting enough to be deemed unlawful. Even if done in public.

You are, and will be allowed to burn whatever book you want in private. No one is banning that. No one is taking that right away from you. This is solely about if it should be allowed in public. If it’s just a form of protest. Or if it is too inciting.

Personally. In general. I don’t think it is too inciting to be banned in public. Unless done outside of embassies or religious buildings. I think that’s too far, that is too inciting with the sole purpose of needless incitement.

If your opinion differ that’s fine.

Right. But we’re not talking about where you are from. We’re talking about where this bill is ongoing. Which is Denmark. What is and isn’t allowed elsewhere isn’t really relevant now is it?

As mentioned already. You can justify it by classifying the action as incitement.

Incitement is illegal. What the bill proposes. Is to classify burning of religious texts as incitement.

The reaction to the burnings can also be illegal, if that reaction is violence and/or threat of violence. Two wrongs doesn’t make a right.

The violent reactions are also not the only ones. Those are just the ones you hear about, because making an article of how some people talk about why they think it’s wrong and hateful in a peaceful way just doesn’t sell as many papers or generate nearly as many clicks.