• 0 Posts
  • 87 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle





  • Godort@lemm.eetoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlshould anything be copyrightable?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Copyright is a good thing in general, but the way it’s handled now is incredibly stupid.

    The US had it right in 1790. 14 years by default and an additional 14 year renewal. After that it’s public domain.

    28 years is more than enough time to profit from a creative work before other people can use those ideas freely.

    Imagine the creative landscape if every piece of art older than 1995 was free for everyone to use as they saw fit.










  • The problem is that while personal renewables exist, they’re still pretty expensive and are largely untested at scale. We’re in that stage that computers went through in the late 90s, where it’s an expensive investment that is likely to be obsolete before the year is over.

    Not many people would be excited to spend ~$30K outfitting a building with solar panels, turbines and batteries only to learn that they need to be replaced in 2-3 years.

    The technology is promising, but it’s not ready for mass adoption yet. We need a stopgap


  • special waste management is doing a lot of heavy lifting

    Yeah, I suppose it is. Although I would argue leaving the waste to future generations is definitely not what we’re doing. Basically, we’re just putting it in a deep hole. Once that underground storage is full it never needs to be opened again. There isn’t any shortage of radioactive elements underground that exist naturally, creating a man-made radioactive pocket deep underground isn’t all that different.

    Not having enough power and more power failures isn’t such a bad trade-off

    The power that gets sent out over the grid does a lot more that charging your iPhone or powering your computer. For example: Electric vehicles(including public transit) relies on it, food preservation relies on maintaining constant refrigeration which would lead to even more food waste, and if a hospital loses power for even a couple minutes there are real lives at stake.


  • Hi, pro-nuclear here,

    That’s the eventual ideal, but energy storage technology isn’t there yet. The biggest issue facing renewables currently is the ability to maintain a base load demand that is increasing faster and faster each year.

    Currently, the cheapest way we have to store energy is to store it chemically, in the form of coal, petroleum, or fissle fuel. Of these, the fissle option is by far the best. It’s by far the most energy-dense, doesn’t release any carbon into the atmosphere when used, and the amount of waste it produces is dangerous, but miniscule in comparison. All the high level waste ever produced since the late 50s could fit in a single building.

    It’s not realistic to fully replace everything with renewables until some very difficult engineering problems are solved. So our choices right now are:

    • build more renewables

    Pros: getting cheaper and more efficient but worse than current tech, no carbon pollution

    Cons: experience more power failures as it cannot meet current energy demands

    • build a coal/petroleum plant

    Pros: very cheap and very efficient

    Cons: accelerate climate change, increase pollution

    • build a nuclear plant

    Pros: can easily meet base load demands, very efficient, no carbon pollution

    Cons: expensive, special waste management is required.

    As things stand now, I would like to replace aging petroleum power plants with nuclear while continuing to build more and more renewables. Then, once we’ve either found a way to reduce energy demand or improve storage, start to phase out the nuclear plants



  • Godort@lemm.eetoAndroid@lemmy.worldWhat do you think about Huawei Harmony OS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Chinese Spyware” is probably a little hyperbolic, but it’s not a claim without merit either.

    Basically, the issue is that companies that operate in China are beholden to an authoritarian government that has the power to get whatever data they want from the company. Add to that, for the average person, their smartphone contains a ton of data about them and is often brought into trusted networks when you turn Wifi on, collecting even more info.

    In the US they were banned largely because the company has very close ties to a foreign government and regulating that communication is far harder once the devices are widely available.

    Right now, that data is mostly used to build a profile about you for the purposes of advertising because that’s what’s profitable, but that data exists and can be used for other things if someone with access wants to.