And even it’s nakedly racist (“A contract, is a contract, is a contract-- but only between Ferengi”) and misogynistic (“Females and finances don’t mix.”)

What does that say about capitalism?

You know, as a big FF8 booster, this makes me reconsider some stuff.

1 and 3 are both great, and I’ll go against the grain and say that 4 is pretty mediocre.

This would be more appropriate for the reaction thread on /c/StarTrek.

And the DIS s1 klingons look broadly like the TNG klingons, just exaggerated.

James Bond, for instance, is a different person from each actor to have played him

That’s not canonical, merely a popular theory.

The idea of being able to essentially species change a Klingon into a Human with TOS-era Klingon medical tech sounds impossibly advanced for what the Klingons are known for.

It’s also something that literally happened in a TOS episode that almost everyone saw and liked.

Then as someone who does know a lot about this stuff I can tell you that you are making a lot of assumptions that are not the case.

It’s one thing to do as a one-off gag or a nostalgia bit. It would not have been possible to take seriously for an ongoing series in 2017, except for hardcore fans that don’t need to be sold on it.

To you.

So why can’t you do that here?

It’s 100 years later.

TMP isn’t.

“so what about Kang, Kor, or Koloth? How do they look right now?”

Like Klingons.

How many more years before the crude, gritty aesthetic of Star Wars suffers the same fate as the crude and campy aesthetic of Star Trek?

People complained about exactly that during the Prequel Trilogy.

I mean… not that much. Daleks have gone through three redesigns just since the show went back. Sontarans went from the world’s most unconvincing rubber masks to makeup. And how many eyes do Silurians have-- two, or three?

because apparently Star Trek, unlike every other fantasy and science fiction thing I like, is Forbidden from being treated like a secondary world that should have its own internal consistency.

Nonsense-- other long-running universes encounter retcons and visual redesigns all the time. Quick, how old was Dick Grayson when he first became Robin? What color is Superman’s S? How old was Magneto during the Holocaust? What happened to Luke’s father? Did James Bond fight in World War 2, or participate the Cold War?

Perhaps it implied that.

But it only ever implied that, and meanwhile we had other evidence that implied a separate conclusion, in the form of Kor, Kang, and Koloth.

Which is more likely-- that every Klingon Kirk encountered during his five-year mission was a survivor of the augment virus (edit: Including Kahless, who lived and died centuries before Archer!) and no Klingon encountered outside of that time period was; or that the Klingons ruthlessly quarantined or even executed carriers of the augment virus and wiped it out before it got too far, and TOS’s visuals aren’t literal?

I dug 'em. It was a good experiment in pushing Trek’s aliens beyond a forehead and an accent.

Or, keeping up SNW’s traditions of reviving projects from early in Star Trek’s history, we could finally get M’benga leading a medical frigate in the vein of the Hopeship pitch.

Is there anyone still holding out for a “refit” of the beautiful SNW Enterprise so that it “really” looks like a set from the late 1960s?

Sadly, I can confirm there are.

Assuming the Eugenics War is still followed by WW3, that only leaves a max of 49 years

What’s so unusual about that? Consider how close World War 1 and World War 2 were to each other. Consider how infrequent global peace is generally.