![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I feel like the quality has been going down especially when you ask it anything that may hint at anything “immoral” and it starts giving you a whole lecture instead of answering.
I feel like the quality has been going down especially when you ask it anything that may hint at anything “immoral” and it starts giving you a whole lecture instead of answering.
I went back to my main comment and read it. I don’t think I conveyed any “nonsense”. Perhaps I could’ve presented things differently? Sure. Also, to say that I’ve been combative in the discussion while you are doing just that is ironic.
I agree with what you’re saying. The reason why I said what I said originally is because there is a decent number of people who only consider science as the only way to truth. Despite logic for example being accepted and needed to do any science.
Right, so in Math we have axioms and we build upon those axioms and construct theorems which are deductively true. They are not true in the same way a scientific theory is. My point is, not everything that can be true needs empirical verification. Math is one example.
Math is based on logic, we can’t prove it scientifically because it’s not something which is empirically verifiable but provable through deduction. If we are happy with logic to prove math what is wrong with logical arguments for God? I’m not against science or needing to prove your theories. I’m only against the notion that if you don’t have empirical proof for God then God doesn’t exist.
Sure. I observe 2 oranges. I can also observe the world around me. Although observation is a part of the scientific method it is not the scientific method it self. Perhaps what I said can use more clarification, take Pythagorean theorem. This is not something which is proverable through science or observation but rather mathematically through logic. Its not something which you can put under a microscope.
You’re telling me you have a way to scientifically prove math? Please show me how you can use the scientific method to prove math.
I feel like it’s quite the strawman or misunderstanding when people ask for material proof of God. Can you prove math using empirical verification? No. because math is not something you can empirically verify as it does not exist materially.
People don’t want to because WFH is much better for employees. Why waste time on commute, gas, and get out from the comfort of your home?
I use it on desktop and phone and honestly been pretty good no complaints.
Seeing what they found vs the fantastical 3D video of the tunnels under the hospital is both funny and sad (for those that died because of it). Israel has had a track record of lying but more than ever thanks to decentralization of information and not having to rely on lying news networks people are seeing the truth.
Although I don’t currently use Wayland I’m excited and look forward to its continued development.
I wonder if this comes due to the EU
Because our government is bought by AIPAC