Osa-Eris-Xero512

Yeah, CC doesn’t cover it in any case. Any attempt would probably need some sort of bespoke license to specifically target the training use case while still allowing comments to be used like normal.

And a Microsoft-sized pile of money to fight it out in court.

I think a lot of the concern here, for me if noone else, is them taking the data and then turning it around into a closed for-sale product. If AI is going to be trained, it should be trained well, but if the result of doing so is them turning around and charging [me/us/everyone, as applicable] an ass load for the privilege of its use then I want no part of it.

AI trained on public data should be public. So if adding boilerplate is the solution to this problem, let it be infectious licensing which forces opening of the resultant model to the public.

I think there might be something to be said here for some potential selection bias. Are Tesla drivers like ram drivers, overly aggressive idiots but with the added layer of being relatively new tech?

I’m convinced that Trekkies and open source tech are concentric circles.

Happily, Lucy Lawless (Xena) is almost exactly opposite, so those shows don’t have to be all bad.

Fun fact: I scrubbed through that whole fight and there is exactly 1 frame where only 4 beams are on screen, and it’s the view screen of the Alito and not a very clear shot. The rest are 5 4 beams or <=3

And in DS9 the big fleet actions only have only a few ships firing at a time. I didn’t think the phaser effect cost that much, but presumably I was wrong about that.

Figured it could work for the meme.

It’s also profitable for long-duration early access games where most of your users and potential purchasers already have already bought it. Good cash injection right at the end of development from an audience that probably wasn’t going to buy it anyway.

https://pixelfed.social/storage/m/_v2/641403985469796943/bc40e5d2a-3c51e6/sxAYNxLWL6ph/uOPWmqr7tFo9df8GsV4l4sziWUP16TKBMD7r1WnT.png

There. Are. Four. Phasers.

There’s blueprints now if that helps.

You see, if they fire everyone from the division, it’ll make even more profit. ez

So now they can pause comments until the heat dies down while looking reasonable because of the existing comments.

Either this is the coldest takedown i’ve seen on Lemmy so far or your instance’s federation is having a sad. I can see 21 comments itt including users from lemmy.zip, lemmy.world, lemmy.nz,and sh.itjust.works

A lot of politician-level takes in this thread.

Oh, I have no issues with pony people. I was more disappointed that UwUntu wasn’t as UwU as I really hoped it would be after I discovered it was a real thing.

At some level I just wanted it to commit to the bit, even if it’s at the cost of usability. Maybe only on 1 Apr or something.

I don’t know what’s worse, that this is real or that it appears to be relatively serious and not just taking Ubuntu and doing an UwU text transform on every localized string.

I’ve always been a fan of the canon interpretation that anything other than the two nacelle pattern was because someone needed to compensate for something in the workload. Battleships (Federation-class variants, Galaxy-X) have 3 so one can get chopped off and they can keep on trucking, quads rotate through them to even wear/allow ‘sprinting’ for longer, singletons being 2 nacelles in a trenchcoat for cost/maintenance reasons (which explains why they’re often proportionally oversized), etc.

Isn’t action like this a crime in the US? I thought I remembered reading that somewhere.

Koncerning

Depending on how long it takes to recharge vs the discharge rate (it doesn’t seem to mention recharge rate in the article) they may be able to shut down 25% of the cooling array to let it recharge while the other 75% picks up the load.

Sounds like software engineering