I think the same and understandable. But I was serious. I wanna know how many Doms and subs we have in the Linux community in comparison to the general population.

There was this tool that would show you how popular a subreddit is in another subreddit based on the general popularity of the sub on Reddit. And there the Taylor swift sub was very popular (like 13 times as popular as “normal”) in the Linux subreddit. So I hope you get what I mean. Seemingly there are certain tendencies in the Linux community.

Thanks that you take one for the team. If we ever meet, I owe you a sandwich.

Out of curiosity, do you want to run a survey? Or is that a joke about helping people to figure out what they are by doing it?

Sorry

Now I would like to know how many Linux users are Doms and how many are subs. I mean a lot of Linux user like the control over the system.

I am only a Linux user. I don’t feel trans, nor am I a furry. Could you become a furry for me to average me out? Thanks!

He is the most obvious case for a good mental health system. That could have went far with enough support. The world lost a great coder

The CEO told the head editor to support a specific political party in Germany. He talks about east Germans like they are lesser. And so much more…

In short, if your news is axel Springer, your news are trash

That is how you get burning cars and extremist.

Well it depends on what you see as an acceptable cost of the benefits of social Media. You could easily find differences between platform, in their function and in their moderation. These differences might be valid reasons to give it a different evaluation.

But in case, you want to argue about whether or not Twitter is moral; and/or whether or not Facebook is as bad as Twitter, I am not interested in the discussion and my points weren’t made in support of the position that Twitter is harmful but only in “defense” of people voicing their moral evaluation of social Media.

I am not saying you are wrong, nor right, but I am wondering why you tell me/us that now, here.

Software is shipped with a license. There are licenses that are more or less ethical.

Well there is a difference between disliking something and believing it is actively harmful. If you believe it is actively harmful for humans and society, it makes sense that you want to appeal to the society as a whole. Then you need to reason for why you feel the way you do. And there we go.

So, you think the argument of “they can’t be a doctor as they are a swimmer” is a good argument? Obviously you can be 2 things.

But even then: The problem is that it is ignorant to Google’s business model. Google is not simply hosting ads in their products as a form of revenue. Google makes 11% of it’s revenue by tracking and hosting ads on other Plattforms. The person calling google an ad company, obviously makes the point that google has a major interest in ads and tracking. 11% of your total revenue is a lot of money to have motivation for having a major interest in ads and tracking. (Btw. This is ignoring the ad revenue that they make on their own properties like YouTube. Which also benefits from the tracking of users on other site. In other words, google has even more of an interest in it then just 11%, in fact 80% of it’s revenue is ads and tracking. But I want to focus on the “what is different from a magazine” part)

In other words, you can be both. Magazines can be an ad company too. And highlighting Google’s interest in ads because 80% of their revenue is from ads and 11% from providing ads to other sites, is hardly wrong if talking about Google’s relationship with ads.

I am not saying you are wrong. I can remember having that issue in the past. I don’t know if it is fixed by now. I just use the quit.

While annoying if it is still the case on Android, I primarily wanted to express that it is a Firefox feature in general.

Just as a sidenote, Thunderbird is not part of the same company as firefox and was part of the Mozilla foundation until 2020. Thunderbird is no longer “out in the cold”. There is a new version (115) that you might want to check out if you like thunderbird.

I don’t want to engage with the rest.

That is a Firefox setting. I use it on my phone.

It is not about the data. It is about the users and communities. They can copy the content but a threads user couldn’t really ask a fediverse user a question through threads. The interaction is why we are on social media. If threads is not part of the fediverse, it can’t provide the users with the same interactions. the fediverse wants users on many different smaller servers. We need to get the user to move to such a server, if we want the fediverse to work.

It is not about data. It is about EEE. They cannot EEE it without showing their hands.

Letting them be part enables their abuse. Not let them join, protect the fediverse and let’s it grow slowly. If you focus on being big quickly, maybe you are right, but if you want to maintain and grow the fediverse for a long time… You are almost certainly wrong.

Requesting your data (GDPR) and using shreddit with the GDPR setting because deletes all your posts and comments. Then you can delete your account and both your account and posts are gone