does Partisan-SMS function as a basic sms messager without encryption?

Might even include some free viruses!

capy.life creator here, incredible tool

Basically think of it as a SDK for defining data deletion on a platform. Omitme handles all the annoying stuff like account storage, building a CLI/GUI & sessions.

The core of Omitme is Seleniumwire used to grab login session tokens for platforms & HTTPX for making requests with those session tokens. Then you simply define you data deletion “targets” and the API calls to delete such data.

Currently it delays if discord issues a rate limit.

Also to note, that Purplix does warn users to assume the site has been compromised if the latest statement has expired.

Agreed, should have an alart for missed canaries. Each canary has “statements” you publish new statements to update ur canary. This provides a signed record of passed canaries.

Browser extension or even mobile app could be another aspect of further securing validation. Currently we do store a offline backup for each public key in idb storage & a signed copy if you have a account for further validation if the URL hash has been tampered with.

Thank you for your kind words ❤️❤️

I’d love to be covered in your blog, feel free to add me on Matrix if you have any questions.

https://matrix.to/#/@wardpearce:matrix.org

Had some services not auto starting correctly, should be fixed

Currently we aren’t taking donations, till we have some sort of transparency system in place.

Thanks for expressing your interest in a blog, could be interested.

has been a old and off project for a few months. Would call it niche in terms of people who care about e2ee tools, but in general how insecure surveys are shouldn’t be as common place as it is.

Its considered a highly experimental feature, so enabling it could result in unknown issues or even security issues.

Also Firefox still lacks isolatedProcess https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1565196

I’d imagine Firefox would enable Fission by default if it was actually ready.

about what i expected

I’m happy for you to provide references what prove me wrong.

yes you must not be federated.

My other comment what you must be referring to is “most insecure android stack”, doesn’t have references I agree & it probably should (thats why i edited it to include them) but its also on people to do their own research and if someone is commenting that their stack is insecure, maybe that person could ask me why or do a little research themselves (instead of just downvoting. Or they could just downvote & ask a question too!).

Also I’m not saying down votes is “harassment” thats insane, people can down votes as much as they want. I’m just over people unwilling to see insecurities after I provide references (like in the comment you can’t see responses to)

Shocker not every comment I make will be prefect & if people genuinely wanted to learn ask questions!

Also this whole idea that its a “negative attitude” is insane, I’m literally telling someone the software they use is insecure.

How did I disregard it? He literally provided a reference what countered his own point.

Like please, if you actually have a point to make. I’d love to know how he corrected me at all.

I think trashing is a overstatement, I’m providing references to my point (Also I LOVE firefox and use it on my desktop what i mentioned! It lacks basic security features on Android, that is not trashing on Firefox!) and I was deffo a bit hostile because he was obviously responding in bad faith.

not sure how I’m being smug (please point to my excessive pride in my achievements) but okay, “harassed” is deffo a overstatement but I’m just sick of people like this https://lemmy.nz/comment/1506835 while I’m trying to help people.

But aside that, people shouldn’t be a asshole to someone just because they come off smug 🤷

The most insecure Android stack

Edit: Because people will just blindly down vote this, here is some references to help you make more informed choices

https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/

https://hacks.mozilla.org/2021/05/introducing-firefox-new-site-isolation-security-architecture/

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1565196

The amount of Firefox fanboys who will get mad at you for mentioning Android Firefox missing per-site process isolation. I’ve basically made the choice to not mention it anymore because I always get harassed whenever I do lol…

Firefox on desktop is awesome, Mobile should be avoided.

Certbot is great when using Nginx (or Apache2), but if you can use a different engine. Its worthwhile checking out Caddy!