bedrooms

I’m sure German public are better than that (except for the AfD voters).

My bet is that this is their big ass bureaucracy getting in the way again.

I mean, they can get closer but that doesn’t mean they’ll have the same market in the end. Even they will, they should not toss away their governmental structures in order to please businesses as the article indicates.

Europe will then become a gigantic organization that takes forever to take any action, with a fragile election system. There’s a reason why Parisians don’t vote on German issues.

According to him, the time has now come to unite and overcome the difficulties linked to fragmented EU regulations in every sector, which slow down the EU’s operation, particularly in response to emergencies.

I’d say what he wants is basically ignore member states for what he wants to do.

Speaking of the EU’s market potential, Draghi called it “too small”, adding that there “are so many markets and therefore the small companies that are born in Europe, as soon as they grow, they sell or go to the United States”.

And that’s because US is a big market. Whatever EU does, the tFrench market will not become identical to the German one, let alone Turkish or Czech

And just imagine. The next Hitler can get the most of europe by one rigged election system and start expanding from there, using the army from Germany, France, Italy, Turkey, etc. etc. It’s just dangerous and idiotic.

Edit: To whoever replied to me with what follows:

None of what you said makes any sense

No, I’m not going to waste time with someone who shows lack of the concept of nuance. Get out of your echo chamber first.

But as they are right wings, they’ll probably say hijabs are religious symbols. I don’t know what they’re thinking but that’s predictable.

“I must say, I keep telling my children: ‘You have to fix it. We goofed it up, you have to fix it.’ So I think here too, the direction of travel – my personal opinion – is clear.”

von der Layen

Watching von der Layen, I often feel like something is off with this woman also.

They’ll say that’s not a symbol.

NK space force achieved Google Map screenshot.

It’s stupid. I agree.

If an Islam woman not in hijab starts wearing headscarves everyday just as a fashion anyway, theoretically it’s not a religious whatever. So what’s the point those far right idiots are making.

EU states have their own sets of laws, so it’s not too surprising to me that the EU laws don’t intervene in this case.

That municipality really showed their islamophobia by banning hijabs in this way, though.

I’m not sure a hijab is a religious symbol. It’s just a covering worn for religious reasons.

The problem is, far rights won’t care.

Just a link to my comment in this thread, sorry. Not something so important but I think they should pay instead.

I explained my opinion here, but they can even pay the user and keep their business going.

The pricing should be the opposite. I should be payed for watching their targeted ads and letting them still use my statistics.

Oh, wait, according to their logic, I should like targeted ads.

Thus, if I choose no targeted ad, I should be paid even more for that. And they can still use my anonymized statistics for their business.

Their logic is completely broken.

No way we have to pay $200. F*** off.

If the are intentionally rushing that way, then they perhaps want to do it while they can predict the outcome.

I don’t know the intention, but I’d imagine those now in power will have more power and for longer.

I get your point, but each EU member state has a democratic solution on its own (yes, with flaws), and EU ain’t a country in the first place.

In other words, they didn’t assemble to start a new country. They were there to collaborate internationally as sovereign states.

These include the transfer of inclusive competency on the matters of environmental protection…, meaning that law pertaining to those matters would be entirely set at the European level.

This damages the environment than protect it. It’s premature.

Although scientifically we probably know enough to find a solution, no country has a successful implementation of environmental protection. We haven’t been shown how these politicians really achieve carbon neutrality. It’s not too different from a made-up fantasy so far. Even EVs have flaws.

My impression is that they’ve possibly made it HARDER to find a practical solution.

Okay I agree with that regarding the content.

The only part they emphasized the ongoing problem is the last paragraph, and their wording is still vague.

“At all levels, from grassroots sports and the gym up to elite levels, there are are still many barriers that result in LGBTQ+ people shying away from participating, and if we want to truly make sport everyone’s game, we need to turn the Rainbow Lace from a symbol of inclusion into a mindset.”

I think what the editor wanted to communicate with the title was that

1. trans people, although discriminated in sports, are increasingly welcomed by fans
2. this can pressure the sports organizations to change their stance

Trans people being discriminated is common sense for almost all readers of that website, so I don’t think it’s misleading.

Yeah but look at Japan. We here have got the same political party (LDP) for like 80 years, no matter what we do. Even when the LDP declared an election “loss”, we still got an LDP cabinet. At least literally 90% of the time.