Like, I’m starting to think it was your alt that made those posts,

This is so dumb but it DOESN’T EVEN MATTER FOR THE ISSUE AT HAND. Stop distracting (also: I think they are valid so why should I have made an alt?)

Or maybe you just want to argue with someone? In that case you’ll need to find someone else too

No, I’m done here

Well they always were pretty radical, so that’s nothing new … But now also the Lemmy community is turning more and more authoritarian (or it wasn’t as apparent to me at it is now). That’s why removing the post is really problematic. With this they seem to silence the extremism problem of the lemmy community, which (also never a secret) is partly due to the developers political standing.

deleted by creator

without knowing any details

Did you read the comments?

Besides, like I said the correct way to handle that is messaging the admins, not putting someone on blast on a bunch of different subs so people would harass them without knowing any details

Well if you contribute to a project AND have very firm political standing you put yourself on public display and have to live with people commenting on it (no harassment of course).

What do you even mean with admins? Like the other developers? They apparently seemed fine with it. Also this is a issue of the broader lemmy community, because we have an extremism problem. Its true that it didn’t start with THIS developer. Silencing it like this is very problematic. Under the post were pretty interesting conversation going on about the broader issue.

But if its a post with a new issue, it should be fine. 4 different subs isn’t spamming. Just remove it in the sub where it doesn’t belong.

Seems like the suspicion that the developers political standing does have an influence over a services community (especially in the beginning) is becoming more and more apparent. Of course the developers political standing somehow influences which users the service attracts.

If Threads joins the Fediverse, people will use it - probably at first without knowing it, but they will use it.

deleted by creator

Well its mostly a matter of taste. There should also be a vote

Well most of the complexity would be hidden. For example the Mastodon mobile client hides much of it. You can even sign up for a server there.

My main concern is the overlap between lemmy instances, meaning me and my mate can be looking at for example a channel named ‘news’ and see different contents because we are on different instances. So you either subscribe to all news channels on all major instances and see lots of duplicated posts, or miss out on some posts.

Yeah there has been much debate going on about that here

I don’t think its naiv. I think its more realistic. I like most about the article that it puts the activitypub-protocol front and center. This is mainly what made me view the fediverse differently. And that therefore power dynamics will probably shift in the next years away from Mastodon.

Actually there is something like this called “Fedivision” :D

Actually, there is something like this called Fedivision :D

That’s SO funny :D Never heard of this

The first one was misleading

There is a eurovision song context, where each country of europe makes one song for. There is a vote. One country wins. Huge fun. Now, if we would do the same thing for the fediverse: which song would you chose?

I have to switch between subscribed/local/all feed all the time. That’s why I proposed a mixed-feed, which merges Subscribed/Local/All feed according to users settings so you don’t have to switch all the time.

I already created an issue: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/2137

I think it would be better to add the option to mark posts as “sensitive” or “not save for work”, which are then blurred for the user and appear when clicked on.

The rest should be up to moderation and everything else is just solutionism.

Totally agree. It would be cool to have some variant of our own that we can share with the world.

Sounds interesting. But it sounds like some centralized AI is in the background managing all the dezentralized communities. I’m a bit doubtful of that - why not let each community have its own AI?