![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/133515d3-1624-4d52-b88c-e19f1a6df0f0.png)
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/fe312eaa-01f1-4d5a-a51d-69b48c129dfd.jpeg)
22·
7 months agoas you said: a motor bike is technically a bicycle. ok. then the feature that makes a different name is the motor, isn’t it? then a bicycle with a motor is a motorbike.
mohamed jordi és el meu pastor, res em manca
as you said: a motor bike is technically a bicycle. ok. then the feature that makes a different name is the motor, isn’t it? then a bicycle with a motor is a motorbike.
nope, are motorbkes
if you also train to not rest so much then it seems a fit issue, these distances on a folding are amazing to me
and I understand you do your resting stops to drink and eat, isn’t it?
do you lubricate your padded shorts?
sure because bicycle is the generic for e-bikes too but this is not the discussion
the discussion is about changing the name for the bikes that doesn’t have a motor just because now the e-bikes are popular in some countries despite the fact that bicycles historically don’t have a motor and the number of bikes without motor is largely superior than the ones with
even the term e-bikes is incorrect! an e-bike should be a bicycle with a dynamo that produces electricity again a bicycle with a dynamo was invented earlier and I suppose there are more bikes with a dynamo than bikes with motor