This is like Kevin Heart warning Mike Tyson. LOL, just funny and stupid.

Translation: We still intend to have the U.S. destroy us.

Iran is begging for us to help their citizens and get rid of the Islamic Republic. I don’t understand why they’re so desperate to get eradicated. Do you think they have the delusion they could fight the US?

Said every apologist for terroism and terrorists.

Russia doesn’t have the ability to conventionally attack Finland in any sustained or meaningful way. Their only deterent is nukes. So I agree it’s just Saber rattling, not a credible threat.

They’ve already lost 300,000+ soldiers in Ukrain, and can’t equip the ones they’ve conscripted.

Reddit and Lemmy are excellent places to track radicals and radicalization. Thanks for your contribution.

That makes LOTS more sense. Thanks so much!

Could a province have a first people’s, or other language as their official, if they wanted? Or is the option just the two national official languages?

Thank you for clarifying. English is the official language of Canada, right? I know provences support French, but is it also an official language?

For instance, in the U.S. there is no national language. Most government forms are provided in MANY languages and/or can be requested in them.

I’m not sure in the US a university could require language profiency in a specific language. To be fair, though, I haven’t researched it. Maybe somebody can clarify if there are any federally funded ones that do?

If Canadian universities require conversational French for 80% of grads but the only official language is English, then I wonder what the legal basis is for the requirement? If both English and Fench are official national languages, I understand how that would be the basis.

Thanks for the conversation, I’m learning a lot.

Is it federally legal for to discriminate based on language? Don’t know, don’t live there, really curious, though.

Or is this one if those things that have to be adjudicated in the courts?

China doesn’t have the ability to project power. It’d be miserable to attack them on their own territory, but other than that, they’re not a serious threat.

Apparently terrorist supporter is going to attempt justification of war crimes and terrorism–as expected.

I have very little concern about the evaluation of the “worthiness of my claims” by someone who posts sources that contradict their own claims.

According to the poll results, some 59% of respondents indicated that they “extremely support” Hamas’ actions on Oct. 7, with another 16% saying that they “somewhat support” them.

Those figures are roughly in line with overall support for Hamas, with the poll finding that a cumulative 76% of respondents hold either a “very positive” or “somewhat positive” view of the group when asked to rank their support for a list of Palestinian political parties.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/palestinian-poll-finds-strong-support-for-hamas-oct-7-attacks-river-to-the-sea-state/ar-AA1k6mEx

Lots of sources have reported on it. If you don’t like that one you can find many more.

Being a terrorist sympathizer is bad. You should change.

Are you kidding? Downvotes by the Hamas supporters here are a badge of honor. I wish there was a profile badge where I could display all the fury of terrorist sympathizers who had their world view challenged and bullshit called out.

Downvote away kiddo.

I also would happily accept downvotes from Nazis, fascists, and capitalists.

Removed by mod

I believe it’s so bad that I take great exception when it is tossed around willy nilly and far short of how it should be used. So, just the opposite of what you’re saying.

As I’ve said many times, I don’t defend or support Likud. They were war criminals before the October attack.

The first one, what’s the question?

I’m sure any sane person would answer no civilians casualties are acceptable. Which one of many reasons why Hamas must be eradicated, co-locating to intentionally cause the death of civilians. It’s why what Hamas is doing by co-locating is one of the worst war crimes.

As for reluctance, I think it’s about everyone knows that nobody except Hamas wants civilian casualties. Look even here on worldnews how successful they’ve been with that propaganda.

And that doesn’t even mention the regular attacks by Iraq, Houthis, Syrians, etc on US troops and civilian shipping lanes.

You think xenophobic means against terrorists? And you’re mad because I’m not supportive of terrorists?

So confusing.

Which atrocities specifically created Hamas?

Was it the multplie wars the Arab countries launched to destroy Israel, and since they failed, it was an atrocity?

Was it when Rabin was trying hard for two states and Arafat walked away at Oslo?

Or was it when Israel ceded control of territories back to the Palestinians and ended up having the Palestinian security forces firing on them in return?

Or were they just rocket enthusiasts who loves lobbing rockets into Israel’s civilans, and decided to form a club?

Was it around 48 when Muslim and Arab states stole the land and kicked out over 800,000 Jews?

Definitely, Arafat ignoring Perez’s plea to crack down on Hamas helped them grow and ultimately get rid of him. OH, IRONY!

Was it thr suicide bombings and bus bombings campaign right before the election that Pereze was leading in, and after the bombings Bibi won by less than half a percent?

Or was it when two states were going to happen, and Hamas vowed never to split Jerusalem and worked to destroy 2 states for religious reasons?

But I’m willing to learn, enlighten me.

I don’t. I call for the prosecution of Bibi and many Likud members for their war crimes before October.

Would love to see them in the ICC.

You must have confused me with the Hamas fans and apologists in here who support terrorism and war crimes and justify and apologize for it endlessly.