Literally nothing can live in pure water. What matters is everything else in the Popsicle, which is mostly processed sugar. Processed sugar is a preservative and will prevent bacterial growth.
science and music. and beer. and dogs.
Literally nothing can live in pure water. What matters is everything else in the Popsicle, which is mostly processed sugar. Processed sugar is a preservative and will prevent bacterial growth.
relevant user name.
Ever notice that you don’t need to refrigerate candy? Processed sugar is such a bad food source for bacteria, you can actually use it as a preservative. The melted Popsicle will rot eventually, if it stays wet, but the likely first organism in will be a yeast.
Thanks for finding these. I couldn’t see them, so I assumed they were removed in response to the complaint.
You’re right, there doesn’t appear to be anything here to object to.
The complaint is not about the terms “systemd” and “segmentation fault.” Those are the titles of the affected artworks. Presumably the artworks themselves contain some trademarked property.
Also, this is utterly unrelated to patents.
Camel case is the way. Why use underscore instead of space when you could just,… not?
“Both sides” is BS
The more market share chrome based browsers have, the easier it is for google to inflict their agenda for the internet on everyone. If firefox didnt exist, every web developer would be optimizing their sites only for chrome, and responding quickly to any change google wants to make.
Not blank for me. I see a bunch of graphs and statistics about the fediverse.
Just nitpicking here: science can never prove anything.
In the second panel the guy on the right acquires evidence that is consistent with the guy on the left having the ability to fly. The fact that he even asked for proof shows that he is not engaged in science here.
They just want to remove their citizens from the internet, not themselves. It’s too useful for disinformation and general fuckery.
So far on Lemmy I had never looked for the option to block a single user. You have changed that.
There’s nothing wrong with email. It is essential for all business transacted online. It’s still, by far, the most useful federated software. All that the “bad actors” can do is send messages that the receiver didn’t want, and that’s trivial to stop.
but unless they are federated we won’t see the ads that they are going to disguise as legitimate user content.
This is truly not meant to be snarky: It sounds like you don’t know how email works.
Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. A standard approach to suppressing wide adoption of FOSS.
some of them blacklist large blocks of ip addresses. Lawsuits can go a long way to forcing them to justify and/or stop this. EFF is working on this, so I give them money. The other thing I can do personally is write to legislators and make sure they are aware of the issue. It’s not yerribly satisfying, but I hope it helps.
In the meantime, I will not be deterred from self hosting. F*@k google.
The big players do definitely try to shut down independent email. We don’t have to let them succeed though, and the way to fight back is to host your own.
Edit: *one way to fight back.
FUD
I have self hosted my email for five years. I’m a hobbyist and it is no problem for me.
Occassionally (very rarely) an email to a new address I’ve never sent before will end up erroneously in a spam folder. This never happens when I send to a business. Instead of everyone throwing up their hands and saying email is way too hard now, how about we hold the big providers accountable for their obvious bullying?
Lemme just dust this off and leave it here
http://www.tatesongs.com/songs/pirates-cheer
from 2006