Why YSK: The term “Genuine Leather” is a marketing term to sell the lowest quality leather possible.

When purchasing a leather product, look for full grain leather or top grain leather instead. These will provide a much higher quality cut of leather that will look and feel much better and last for much longer.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not quite. The truth is, there is no universally recognized grades of leather. But when bragging about quality, genuine leather is the lowest bar they can go (other than bonded leather, which isn’t fully leather but just a veneer over fabric.

    Full grain or top grain is generally what you want.

    https://lifehacker.com/what-genuine-leather-really-means-1850309049

    Also, some are concerned about the use of an animal product. The vast majority of leather is a byproduct of the beef industry. It is skin that would otherwise go to waste. And it is also far more environmentally friendly a material than many alternatives, which are often made of plastics.

    • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, honestly you should buy leather products based on brands than on description of “genuine” leather.

      And agree, real leather is a much better alternative to the ridiculous amount of micro-plastic synthetic leather generates, especially since it’ll last you decades if you maintain it well.

    • queermunist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the industry recapturing some of its costs by reducing waste. That’s still supporting the industry.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We applauded Native Americans for using every part of the animal, yet when we do it today somehow it’s a bad thing.

        The skins are there rather you like the industry or not. Better to use them than throw them in a landfill.

        • queermunist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          By your logic, why don’t we flay off the skins of all dead people and wear those too? They’re just going to waste!

          I’m opposed to the animal killing industry and all of its various outgrowths. The less money that can be made from it, the less money will be invested into the industry in the first place. If the skins end up in a landfill, that’s lost revenue that makes the industry suffer. Putting money in the pockets of these businesses just lets them reinvest. Stop trying to portray your choice to wear skin as somehow the more ethical one and preach from some imaginary moral high ground.

          • imagoodmushroom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d genuinely prefer if my family turned my remains into a fucking backpack instead of paying thousands of dollars to put them on a cushioned box in the ground

          • debased@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            gotta love all the people throwing shade at you but never showing any actual counterargument. Average carnist behaviour, gotta keep the cognitive dissonance at bay.

            • queermunist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Don’t you see? By not draping ourselves in the flesh of dead animals we’re actually being disrespectful of their sacrifices!!! You don’t want animals to end up in landfills, do you?

              Bleh. There’s nothing worse than these preachy types who try to assuage their guilt by presenting their practices as ethical. At least carnists that don’t care about animals are honest with themselves

            • queermunist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Tan me hide when I’m dead, Fred
              Tan me hide when I’m dead
              So we tanned his hide when he died, Clyde
              And that’s it hangin’ on the shed!
              Altogether now!

              (actually, I unironically think human remains should be reused instead of preserved in a box lol)

  • Nora@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t buy leather. Cows are sentient beings with their own subjective experience. Actions that inflict unnecessary harm upon others should be reconsidered.

    If you downvote, you must have a justification for buying leather and I’d love to hear it.

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      the harsh truth of this existence is that some life kills other life. its just the way it is. from the cellular level all the way up to orcas killing seals. its natural and fine imo. of course we shouldn’t go out of our way to inflict unnecessary pain and suffering. but if im going to eat a cow which i do regularly, then im also going to use every part of the cow because its the right thing to do. including its skin to make myself a nice leather knife sheath or a nice pair of leather boots. leather is an excellent material for all kinds of things humans can use.

      • Nora@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do you think it’s wrong to waste part of a cow? It’s clear you think they deserve moral consideration, but you don’t need leather or meat, so it is automatically unnecessary pain and suffering. Many terrible things happen in nature, rape and killing and eating babies etc. We don’t use what happens in nature as moral justification.

          • Nora@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right so we still have to decide whether or not rape and murder are morally okay considering it happens elsewhere in nature. If someone else does something, does that make it okay to do it to another person?

            • Steak@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              is it morally right to destroy thousands of acres of land to grow soy? what about the animals that used to call that place home? the only way to live a life free of any moral infractions is to die on the spot. i choose my moral infractions as wisely as possible. my meat comes from a local butcher that practices circular agriculture. is it perfect? no something must still die so i can live. but something must die so you can live as well. i just don’t sit on a high horse and pretend im better than others.

              edit: im also currently in the process off acquiring a firearms license as i live in northern Ontario and the hunting is good here. so pretty soon i will be acquiring my own meat in what is in my opinion, the most moral way possible. i will hunt for my own meat. the animal will have lived a beautiful life in nature where it belongs, right up until the moment i kill it. i will use every piece of the animal to feed myself, my family, and my friends.

              • Nora@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                77% of the soy grown is fed to livestock. If the world went vegan, we could reduce total farmland by 70%. The other thing is as science develops, with perfect farming methods, vegans would cause zero deaths, whereas animal farmers are always going to be killing animals intentionally. You should minimize the harm you cause. A cow doesn’t care if it was murdered locally or not. All these businesses that pretend to sell an ethical animal product are scamming people with trivial labels. The animals you murder are living their own lives, why take that from them? Deer have families too. Hunting is also totally not practical for a significant portion of the population to do. Farming plants can feed the planet without destroying the it. The animals you kill are living beings with their own experience.

    • gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Justification: I like to eat cows, they taste good. Might as well use the skin when the animal is killed anyway. Also leather is a really good material for a lot of things.

      • nattekrant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love meat, I like a good leather jacket. I want a world where we take good care of our animals, take no more than we need and then use the entire animal as efficiently as possible. Reality however is a lot more cruel and wasteful. It is everyone’s personal choice but I chose to stop purchasing cow and pig products.

        • Nora@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t need leather or meat. You are taking more than you need. You should really watch dominion so you can see that you absolutely don’t take good care of the animals. A personal choice does not inflict harm on others. We should aim to minimize cruelty and wastefulness.

  • Moops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It seems so odd too because if I didn’t know better, I’d assume “Full or Top Grain” was lower quality than “Genuine Leather” just by how the phrases sound.

  • niktemadur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In one of those 70s Fat Albert episodes, I think it was Rudy who one day showed up wearing a jacket of “genuine imitation leather”. That term has stuck with me for decades.

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can somebody explain why leather is better? It’s it the smell? The feel? Tradition? I see it in car reviews where they complain about cloth.

    • kcdaguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is something people think they want because it is more expensive and in higher trim levels in cars. But when your car is parked in the hot sun the leather feels like it burns and in the winter is freezing to the touch. Leather also doesn’t breath so you end up sweating more and if your are not wearing long pants your leg will stick to the seat. Cloth is so much better functionally. Cloth also lasts longer than the fake leather they put in cars. Cloth won’t peel like the fake leather.

    • Sentiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s breathable but works in both warm and cold weather. This makes it ideal for spring and autumn. It’s easy to clean although it’s also hard to maintain (you have to oil it and protect it against rain). It lasts for very long if you care for it unlike fabric or fake leather, so a leather jacket can be worn for decades and still look and feel great.

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surely leather is skin and skin is very definitely non porous? Secrete oils from tiny glands? Yes. Let water through? Very much nope.

        • Sentiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s various types of leather, some of which are actually porous. I’m no expert but you can Google it.

          The point about rain protection isn’t related to the water getting through but because rain can contain chemicals and salt which can stain the leather and also make the leather brittle and vulnerable to mechanical damage, like getting cracks on it because it loses some of it’s natural elasticity.

          This is usually prevented by oiling it and putting various rain protection products on it.

  • SweetSitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should also know that technically only the piece marked as genuine leather needs to actually be genuine leather. If you buy something made with multiple pieces, the rest could be made from any material so long as that one piece is genuine.

      • CountZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know what’s cool about “natural flavors”? They just have to be found in nature to call them that. They can be synthesized in a lab and still be a “natural flavor.”

        P.S. don’t fall for the naturalistic fallacy. This comment is about tricky vocabulary used by the food industry. Whether or not a chemical is found in nature has nothing to do with whether it is good or bad for you. Arsenic is natural.

        • ShadyGrove@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup! “All Natural” is just a marketing term, there’s no regulations behind it. USDA Organic is a real thing though, farms need to be organic for 7 years to be labeled that, if I recall correctly at least

  • dadbod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re looking for bifl full grain leather stuff, hanks belts is pretty good. not cheap, but you only need one ever.

  • c4@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I can say is that it’s still at least leather. Most things (e.x., belts) will say “manmade leather” or “manmade materials” and they are fake and break. The genuine leather belt I have has been working for 4 years without snapping.