• moon_matter@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Won’t Rocky have the same issue as Alma? RedHat has made RHEL closed source, so how can they maintain compatibility?

    I suspect Rocky and other source rebuilds just haven’t made the announcement yet. Alma was merely the first to make an official statement.

    • Raphael@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      RedHat has made RHEL closed source,

      You’ve said the words, corpo-apologists will start haunting you now, good luck fending them off.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rocky has announced their plan to continue as a 1:1 source rebuild. They’re looking at using sources from RedHat’s Universal Base Image Docker images, and also using cloud instances with consumption based pricing. With the latter option you spin up an instance on AWS/Azure/DigitalOcean/etc and it has a license for that instance, so you get the sources for the package versions on that instance. But since the license was temporary, then there’s nothing for RHEL to terminate when you redistribute the sources.

      RedHat says they don’t want clones of RHEL. I say give it to them, lets have a landscape where they’re no longer the de facto standard because there are no other distributions targeting RHEL compatibility.