What filesystem is currently best for a single nvme drive with regard to performance read/write as well as stability/no file loss? ext4 seems very old, btrfs is used by RHEL, ZFS seems to be quite good… what do people tend to use nowadays? What is an arch users go-to filesystem?

  • SinJab0n@mujico.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends, for a normal user? Ext4, maybe btrfs because in terms of stability is the best {but u lose some functions like the ability to make a swap file, wich today isn’t really that useful, but u lose the ability to make one). Want something really fast fort large files? ZFS, but if u experience an energy loss it could be really catastrophic.

    Ext in general is so good that even to this day android it’s still using EXT2, 2!

      • SinJab0n@mujico.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        First of all, thanks this r news for me. But I don’t think is a good idea to use the swap file in btrfs.

        It is supported since kernel 5.0

        There are some limitations of the implementation in BTRFS and Linux swap subsystem:

        filesystem - must be only single device
        
        filesystem - must have only single data profile
        
        subvolume - cannot be snapshotted if it contains any active swapfiles
        
        swapfile - must be preallocated (i.e. no holes)
        
        swapfile - must be NODATACOW (i.e. also NODATASUM, no compression)
        

        With active swapfiles, the following whole-filesystem operations will skip swapfile extents or may fail:

        balance - block groups with extents of any active swapfiles are skipped and reported, the rest will be processed normally
        
        resize grow - unaffected
        
        resize shrink - works as long as the extents of any active swapfiles are outside of the shrunk range
        
        device add - if the new devices do not interfere with any already active swapfiles this operation will work, though no new swapfile can be activated afterwards
        
        device delete - if the device has been added as above, it can be also deleted
        
        device replace - ditto
        
        • LaggyKar@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, there are some limitations to be aware of, with how it interacts with certain features. But EXT4 doesn’t have any of those features at all. It doesn’t have CoW, or balance, or multi-device, or snapshots.

          If the filesystem, is single-device, and you have the swapfile on it’s own nocow subvolume, preallocate the swapfile, and don’t try to take snapshots of it, it should be fine.